The DEATHBRINGER RPG Kickstarter, err, Backerkit is up and running

 

Can't rally argue with that art ...

Sure, I'll hype it because it looks interesting, I've been hearing about it for years, and I like what I see of the guy running it. It feels a little like Spaceballs - it's Deathbringer: The Crowdfunding!

I like a lot of what Professor DM puts out there. He's a YouTube guy but don't hold that against him. He's of a similar vintage as some of us who have been doing this for a while and he's not just there to hype the latest thing for D&D - he may be big on hyping his own thing now, and he's definitely a D&D type game guy, but he's not a big WOTC guy, and he also doesn't push everything OSR as the one true way. 

I know guys who used to draw stuff like this in high school

I was already interested in this one but I will say that playing Dungeon Crawl Classics for a while now has me even more interested. Taking the old school basics and customizing them in some significant ways is far more interesting to me (and rewarding to play) than just re-editing the same damn rules we were all playing 40+ years ago. I have that already - do something new with it! I think we have a great example here.

His whole approach is less rule-mongering and more doing things in the game. I appreciate that. There is a lot of stuff that has built up over the years in D&D type games  - and others too - that is mostly there because it's been there in prior editions and more rules and clutter are hung off of these parts with every update. One great example of clearing a section is the combat zone/"Ultimate Dungeon Terrain" thing he uses:

He typically shows this on a lazy susan in the middle of a table so it can be rotated by players as needed. Notice the change here from modern D&D - we're not counting squares. It's a simple question of "how close are they?" with three possible answers. Now this is not the first game to use abstract distances, range bands, etc. but it's presented here as a concrete physical representation that facilitates play in a big way. To me that's useful. For some games I like counting my squares or hexes and drawing my maps but sometimes this approach would save a lot of time. Mutants & Masterminds, to get away from the dungeon for a minute, uses a similar concept when it comes to ranges and I could definitely see using a diagram or layout like this the next time I run that game. Would I use it for a 4th Edition D&D game? No. Traveller? Maybe. Champions? Not sure. It's a useful concept that's easily ported to other games.

Some other points I liked:

• You get three "death dice" to use during a session to add to rolls. They're d6's, they refresh every session and there's no carrying them over. This is clearly very bennie-like ala Savage Worlds but I like bennies so  I like this.
• Initiative: Straight from the KS page - whoever started the fight goes first, then their side; players declare actions clockwise, then everyone rolls at once. Simultaneous fights resolve as chaotic mass rolls. We've been playing around with ideas on initiative here so I like seeing a set of rules - especially a D&D type game - that doesn't get hung up on individual initiative. It's become a very "set" element in games these days and I'm convinced there is a lot of room to experiment. 
• Death: it can happen a lot in a combat-heavy D&D type game so why not do something fun with it? Here he spells out 3 stages:
• First time dying gets you a scar and something called a Prestige Talent which buffs your character
• Second time means you're "maimed" and get another talent
• Third time, well, you're about to be dead but you get one final action that's an automatic crit success. 
  
  Awesome! I like these a lot!

So I see a lot to like here with multiple concepts that distinguish it from Yet Another B/X Game. I also see a few things some people may not like:

• It's a class and level, armor class and hit point system, d20 based. It's fine by me but I know that's not attractive to some. I see that it goes to level 20 and my feeling is that 10 would probably be enough but the ridiculous over-the-top vibe here probably demands 20 levels.
• The contributing writers for the adventures at least are all YouTubers. Some of them have a track record of published material but some of them ... I don't know.
• The rewards are ... also ridiculously over the top. Shirts, jackets, posters, dice (multiple sets), pins of the class archetypes (?) ... yeah that's a red flag for "Crowdfunding Success" as it's a bunch of crap no one actually needs to play the game but pads out the KS $$$ figures. I get it, I won't begrudge someone making money but these are the kinds of items that tend to get delayed or screwed up in some way that tarnishes the whole effort and to have that many of them ... it's not great. 

Finally there's the timeline: They state Spring 2027 to deliver final PDFs and Summer 2027 to ship the printed material. Well, I'd love that to pan out - but I wouldn't count on it. PDM has been running Deathbringer for people for years but now they're going to be putting it out for playtesting to backers and I suppose we will see how that goes. 

Now I don't want to seem all down on this - one of the things I do like about it that I haven't mentioned is that there is a definite point of view here. From the tone - which you can detect from the art alone I would say - to the philosophy of make it faster and make it more exciting and action-oriented - I like it when a game designer has a well-defined concept of what they want a game to do. I am excited to see this coming out and I will probably back it at some level and I will try running it for my crew with whatever version of the rules I can get ahold of. It looks like a lot of fun and I hope the whole thing goes well and in a year I can say "wow what a great effort  and a great game.

40K Friday: Orks, Grey Knights, and Dark Angels

 

The focus has not been super-strong lately but I've accomplished a little bit. 

The Grey Knights have been one main area and, feeling that I have enough infantry to play something fun for now, I have mainly been working on the Dreadknight situation. This is mostly because I have 3 of them sitting on the table not-finished and 2 more in boxes waiting to be built as shiny new -Grandmaster- Dreadknights with some of the new bits. It's been a fight in trying to figure out how far I want to go with each one versus what is "good enough" to call done and move on - and this army needs a lot of that last part. Hoping to get at least 1-2 of them into the case this weekend and then knock out the rest soon. That will make for a somewhat top-heavy force but I still have some Purifiers, Purgators, and Terminators/Paladins to build so it will even out. The real question is "how much of this can I get to DONE before their codex comes out and changes up a bunch of stuff?" We will see.

These heads are perfect for what I was thinking but once they are on ... man ...

The Orks were getting a fair amount of attention before and now with the Armageddon set having arrived they've been getting a strategic rethink. As I mentioned here I've been contemplating making a new separate Blood Axe force with a mix of older and newer models. I had a pretty solid idea of what I wanted to use in it - most of which I already had - so with a theme and the units it was just a matter of building some of the parts. I started sticking my 3rd-party heads onto my older boyz torsos and ... I do not like the way they look ... at all. It's rough. The alternate heads make the hunched-over ork boyz look even more off-kilter. I'm going to try building some from scratch and see if I can make them look better as I was adapting some already built models. I'm also going to see if I can make the heads work with the older monopose boyz or with the Armageddon monopose boyz as some of them have separate heads. If that doesn't work then the Blood Axe heads may get set aside into the Ork Bits box and used for vehicle riders or drivers or something and they all get rolled into the Goffs. It's disappointing but not every plan works out.

Digging through the Armageddon box also got me to thinking about the Marine half. For the first time in a while I really had few specific plans for that side of a big box. I figured the heavy bolter guys would probably go into the Crimson Fists because that's a thing with them but otherwise it was pretty open. I'll find a home for them eventually but there wasn't really any urgency about it. 

The intercessors in the box are especially ... mundane. My core, modern (meaning primaris-updated) forces are the aforementioned Fists, my Blood Angels, and my largely-unbuilt-but-always-in-the-back-of-my-mind Black Templars. Team Blue and Team Red already have multiple intercessor squads and Team Fanatic doesn't really care about them as I prefer to focus on Crusader squads as a unique Templar thing. So what was I going to do with a squad or two of a unit with no obvious home?

I thought about whether I could convert them to something else but that's more challenging with the monopose stuff. Even making them additional Sternguard could take some work to make them look right.

Then the wandering mind pulled down my Ravenwing box while moving stuff around and a new virus took hold ... 

"At one point you had an active Dark Angels army ... earlier this year you  set up a Ravenwing force and counted up enough terminators and Deathwing Knights to make a Deathwing army ... why not fill in some Greenwing units and just Primais-ize your Dark Angels?"

I mean ... I have the other stuff already - built and basecoated - and I wouldn't be buying anything new since the Armagedodn box was a done deal ... sure, it could actually work ...

I think they will look good in black. I like to use power swords in my DA army anyway so these will fit right in.

So now the latest distraction for 2026 is tweaking the kinda-sorta Dark Angel "wing" elements and bridging them with "regular" space marine pieces. I was also trying to figure out what to do with the Vanguard Vets as I don't really want them in the Fists and my Blood Angels are already well-supplied with jump assault squads of various types - where could I put them that they would make a difference? Well, they would make for a nice flexible element for a reborn Dark Angels force now wouldn't they?

Then of course the next thought is "maybe I should get another squad too while they're cheap - NO!

Regardless I already have a bunch of older characters in the Dark Angel box, plus some modern dreadnoughts, plus these new models, plus some other uncommitted newer units (Hellblasters?) and suddenly that's a pretty solid army. I'll save the potential structure for another post but it feels good to find a way to actually use some of the new units I was undecided on. Fortunately my Dark Angels paint scheme is pretty simple too so I might be able to get them painted up fairly quick - well quick for me anyway.

More next week as I chronicle this poorly-focused journey into hobby madness.

A Quick Anecdote on AD&D 2E and the 1993 Origins Convention

 

Mike Mearls posted an article today referring back to his introduction to AD&D 2nd Edition and it triggered a memory I do not think I have shared here before. 

As far as 2E goes my friends and I at the time thought it was pretty good - yes it changed up some things from what we had before but some of those we knew were going to be changing (thank you satanic panic) and we liked a lot of the rest. The Dragon Magazine preview booklet had given us time to digest some of the new before it officially arrived. We rolled up new characters, translated a few, and made the jump without much angst or drama. We played it a lot through the 90's.

Right, that one

The memory deals with the '93 Origins Game Fair which was held in Fort Worth that year. I had heard of Origins for many years at that point but had never been to one. We had a bunch of smaller local/state cons in Dallas and occasionally one in Ft. Worth but this was going to be a big one. I played in the Star Fleet Battles tournament - briefly. I went with my best friend at the time and I believe we also played in a big Battletech game and a decent sized Warhammer Fantasy fight. The dealer's room was a big draw of course and I spent a fair amount of time at the GDW booth as Traveller: The New Era was a big new thing in our world at the time and I was interested to see what was coming next. 

This one is probably worth another post.

The most relevant part to this memory spark was later in the con when the live auction hit. There was a lot of cool stuff - remember we didn't have eBay available at the tap of an app back then - and I don't think I won any of it. Near the end though the 1st edition AD&D books started to show up - pretty much an avalanche of 1E books I would say. Lot after lot - and no one was buying them! 

Dominating - in 1993 anyway

I saw PHBs, DMGS, MMs, and all of the later hardbacks - in all of the various covers and in everything from "perfect" to "run over by a cement truck in a rainstorm" condition - showing up with opening bids set at 1$ and even lower, stacking up at the auction table as book after book came up with no takers. Every once in a while someone would drop 50 cents on one, but no one was paying significant money for any of them. 

Some were pristine, some were far rougher than this. Ripped, torn, chewed, submerged at some point ... 

I know a lot of the retro crowd likes to make a big deal out of people who never stopped playing AD&D but standing in that room at that con it was very evident that the time of 1E was over. At last as far as the people at the convention were concerned. I assume a lot of people held onto their books - I know I did - either out of nostalgia or sure, maybe thinking they might run it again someday, but 4 years in Second Edition was the version people cared about. It was a shock to see how things had turned around where books that were such a huge part of our lives were now effectively worthless. Edition changes were still somewhat new then. How that has changed!

The Water Gardens, right next door to the convention center.
"You may remember me from such films as "Logan's Run" ...

Postscript: Yes it did occur to me years later that I could have made some money if I had jumped in and bought up some of those books.

Post-postscript: That said, even circa 2010 when I was outfitting the boys with the full set of Basic/Expert/AD&D/AD&D 2E/D&D 3E player books* it was not difficult to find examples of all of those online or in used bookstores nor were they priced like a "collectible". So I would have been waiting for a few more years to make my fortune with the "Origins Haul".

*We were playing 4th at the time after playing a lot of Basic D&D and I wanted them to be able to join any game they ran across with friends or whoever. Hey, they were interested and I had the chance to do it so why not?

"Feel" and Old School RPGs

 

Around here we've had a lot of talk comparing DCC and other old-school rules to D&D 5E and our recent Tales of the Valiant campaign. It has a very different feel from 5E D&D and its variants which tend to rapidly develop into superheroic levels of power. While that's fun, some of the group is very interested in the more bare-bones stuff where the answer to every problem is not "what class ability or feat can I use here?" Some of these old-school games not even having a skill list is a real shift in perspective back to the old days. We've had plenty of fun with the more modern games but this experience had me thinking back to 10-15 years ago when I was introducing the boys to Basic D&D and they were just doing all kinds of improvising and thinking on their feet too. 

I don't hate modern games of course - I've run them quite a bit over the past ten years+ - but I do see the difference in attitude that much more clearly right now. Online discussion is so tied up in "balance" - between classes, party vs. monsters, and encounters in general, that it amazes me. It feels like so much of the talk around the game gets wrapped around its own axles that it misses the point of what the game is for: you're supposed to play it!

Someone in this picture may well be complaining about balance ...

I think there are far more people talking about RPGs than are actually playing them. This is not a new or revolutionary take, I'm just feeling it more after diving in to a different game for a few weeks. People comparing builds, people doing a bunch of math comparing classes to each other, people running the monster numbers in similar ways ... it feels like pointless electron burning to me most of the time because most of it occurs in a featureless clean-room situation with no campaign details of note. Stuff like "this dragon is a poor opponent for a party of 8th level PCs because it's AC and damage output are under-spec for what's expected at that level". OK, sure. Is there a lair involved? Offspring" Worshippers? A mate? A river of bubbling lava flowing through it's rest chamber? Does the party have a sword of dragon-slaying?  Does the dragon have some magical trick or effect that makes it immune to normal weapons? Does it speak? This kind of stuff is mostly ignored in these mathematical exercises which brings me back to wondering  - what's the point? 

If you love the game, maybe it's D&D 5.5, is this all you have to say about it? Is it what you want to focus on? Anyone with the books or PDFs can run the math on these things - it's not hard. What about your campaign? What's the setting? What's going on there? How many people are playing in it? What kinds of characters do you have in your group? Is there something going on you've never seen before? Tell me about the special parts - the math of the game is not the special part!

It just feels like so much energy is expended on stats, product announcements & debates, rules talk, edition talk, and balance yet far less is spent on things coming out of actual play in actual campaigns. You know ... the thing we're all trying to do with this mass of paper & words & possibly electrons.

A wizard, a warlock, and a sorcerer debating who is breaking the game this week

I can say digging into DCC conversations there are no balance debates about a new warlock subclass and whether it's free zap power should be 1d4+1 auto-hitting or 2d4 with a hit roll. There's very little complaining about monster damage or AC or hit points. Questions about encounter balance tend to be coming from people new to the game who are coming over from 5E and similar games, not from people already playing the game. The atmosphere and mechanics of the game help point out that not everything a party encounters is meant to be defeated in combat by using character powers. This leads to some interesting situations and some creative thinking, moreso than I typically see in more modern games. I've seen PCs run away, set up traps and ambushes, use the environment, and generally just engage with the game more, beyond doing some math and burning some metagame resources. 

Now I'm not going off into some one-true-wayism here. I'm just enjoying a refresher course in why these games work for many people. By all means, if a game tells you that balance is tremendously important and gives you an elaborate mathematical framework to ensure it, then it really should should work. If it doesn't then the company should be griped at for it - the later D&D 3E Monster Manuals were notorious for violating their own monster creation rules and there were people whose main claim to fame in the forums was going through and checking the math on every monster as the books came out. If that gives you some joy then hey, that's cool, but hopefully you're also using them in your campaign while you do this. I can read the monster entry myself - if it looks interesting I'll end up using it somewhere. If it looks boring I probably won't - the math doesn't really affect me one way or the other because I don't care that much about theoretical balance in a roleplaying game!

I don't get too caught up in edition debates for say, D&D, because I've run and played every edition and I've had fun in all of them! Balance and edition-warring is not really a thing that comes up at a table during a game in my experience. It mainly shows up in online forums. 

Even newer but say, less "rules-heavy" games tend to fall into that old-school side of things. If you don't have a detailed skill system then tasks tend to be resolved fairly quickly and you don't have endless debates about the utility of various skills.  

Classless games avoid some of this as well - a lot of the Traveller discussion I see is more about the setting, its technology, and interesting situations than it is about "builds" and balance. 

Maybe "were mad" ...

Savage Worlds does this too - discussion tends to be more settings, using tests and tricks in play, and "would you allow this" type questions than rules. I mean there are rules questions but they tend to be from new players trying to figure out initiative, arcane backgrounds, bennies, and shaken vs. wounds ... so many questions about "shaken" ... the single most misunderstood part of the game for the last 20+ years.

The last thing I'll point out here is that games (like a lot of OSR games) where there is a real threat of character death do tend to play differently as well. Aside from all of my other takes up there, Feeling like their pc is vulnerable makes a huge difference with the players I know. Low level D&D in most versions, most OSR games, DCC, GURPS, Traveller, and Savage Worlds all have some of that feel because even an experienced character in those latter games can die with a few bad rolls of the dice.

So hardcore they named a station after it!

Anyway that's enough ranting for today. Crossing the streams by sampling the online discussion around some different games sent me down a rabbit hole so I thought I would share. Tomorrow: 40K talk, where balance is never a topic of debate.

See it's a cloud giant because I'm shouting at ... oh never mind ...

My RPG List Ten years On - 2016 vs. 2026

 

I keep track of my RPG and miniature purchases as I go each year and I have done this for more than a decade. I was updating my list for this year and it occurred to me I ought to go look at what I was buying and what I was playing and compare it to now plus mix in some hindsight.

What I was playing:

• The year started off with some Marvel Heroic
• Most of it was spent running my Pathfinder Wrath of the Righteous campaign into the ground
• Lots of talk about the new Savage Worlds Rifts books that were getting Kickstarted back then. Lots of Savage Worlds talk in general from cards to using it with different settings.
• Managed to work in some Deadlands and some d6 Star Wars
• Later we managed to work in some FFG Star Wars
• Holiday time meant it was time for the Time of Crisis in Mutants & Masterminds!

It's funny that it took me ten years to finally finish Time of Crisis - at least it was with a couple of those same players! Otherwise this year it's been playing DCC and then hopefully in a bit it will be back to some Savage Worlds. I do have some consistency I guess even a decade later.

Miniatures-wise it was Eldar ... so much Eldar. This was the year I built what is still the core of my Eldar army.

What I was picking up:

• Perhaps not surprisingly it was a lot of Savage Worlds stuff
• There was also quite a bit of Pathfinder
• A fair amount of d6 Star Wars
• A little FFG Star Wars - they were still putting out new material then
• Some Mutants & Masterminds books
• Some DCC books and dice
• A few 5th edition items

It is good to see that most of what I was adding was being driven by what I was playing or thinking about playing. This year was effectively the end of that Pathfinder campaign as it just ran out of gas after 3 + years. I officially ended it in January 0f 2017.  Both Star Wars games and M&M and Deadlands remained intermittent occasional games for years.

For 2026 so far it's been a few DCC books, catching up on some 5.5 D&D books, and then weirdly picking up some old GURPS books. I don't know exactly what bit me there other than some long talks with Blaster about old school non-D&D grittier systems where I mentioned GURPS as a very different flavor of fantasy campaign compared to modern D&D. I then went to look for it on my shelf and at some point, maybe in a move, I lost half of my old GURPS books - I didn't even have an old 3rd edition core book anymore. So I went on a tear for a bit here recently filling in some of that stuff - you know Magic, The Grimoire, High Tech, Ultra Tech, Supers, a core book or two. They are not particularly pricey especially if you can find several of them in a lot and I wanted them back on the shelf.

Considering how much of what I am doing now is similar to (or the same damn thing) I was doing then I guess I can claim a "consistency" medal. Some might whisper "stuck in a rut"* but I prefer to think of it as being at a point in my life where I know what I like and I prefer to spend my time there. I still do a little exploring now and then. We try new games via one-shots or short limited campaigns, get a consensus on them, and then either put them aside or consider them for a bigger campaign down the road. I see people online struggling to find people and places to play - well, I have time, a place, and a group of friends that are interested so let's spend most of that time playing stuff we like. It makes sense to me, anyway.

* Considering the number of games I've run and played over the last few years it's a pretty wide rut.

Midsummer RPG Action

 

Things have been on hold for a few weeks while I was touring the local hospital but we are finally getting back in the saddle today with more Dungeon Crawl Classics. We're all level 1 and whoever survives will likely make it to level 2 after tonight which will be about as far as any of us have gotten in this game. it is a lot of fun regardless. 

One of the interesting things that has happened is something I wish for anytime I bring up a new (or old) game with the crew. We played it as a one-off that I ran a while back. The group kept talking about it occasionally as we played through Time of Crisis and as we finished that up and started looking at the next round we decided to play some DCC before we started up the next longer campaign with Necessary Evil. Plus we decided to have Variable Dave DM it so I could play for a bit. It has really hit something with our crew as there's a lot of talk about the openness of the old school approach compared to all of the modern versions of D&D and I am happy to hear it. 

One example here being the "Mighty Deeds of Arms" ability of the fighter which lets a character pull off a cool move with a combination of a good die roll and coming up with a relevant stunt. It replaces all of the cruft around Disarm, Bull Rush, Shove, and more - all of those nifty fighting man/swashbuckler type moves that get tangled up in overly specific rules and feats and skills and class abilities in the more recent versions of the game. There is a defined mechanic associated with it, and one does get better at it as one levels up, but it's one mechanic followed by suggestions and examples of what one could do with it rather than a discrete list of all the possibilities. It's a great approach and it does work in play. 

It's been liked enough that we are probably going to run up through 3rd level and then pause to start Savage Worlds with an eye towards dropping the DCC option in here and there over the rest of the year. I'm going to be looking for some obvious break points where we could take a session or two to sidetrek into some weird adventure before going back into supers-land. It may not be viable but it's worth trying out and it would be good to keep some system familiarity alive for a while.

Anyway that's where things stand here at the moment but there is definitely more to come. 

40K Friday - Armageddon Updates

 

I found myself forced to the sidelines here for most of June thanks to some hospital time - there's a first time for everything! - but I am getting back into the swing of things. I'll focus on the miniature stuff today and talk about the rest in another post.

I did manage to order and receive the new big box set while I was entangled. It's good but I do have some comparisons and some thoughts. On the marine side - there is always a marine side with these - it's not as exciting as the past few sets. 

• 8th edition brought us the initial wave of primaris stuff which were all new models and units, even if some of us were not entirely thrilled at this approach to a marine update.
• 9th edition (Indomitus) brought us some cool characters and new units which were pretty well-received:
• 1 Primaris Captain (Sword and shield captain)
• 1 Primaris Lieutenant (Pistol and shield lt.)
• 1 Primaris Chaplain (first primaris version)
• 1 Judiciar (new character type)
• 3 Bladeguard Veterans (new unit)
• 1 Bladeguard Ancient (new character type)
• 3 Outriders (first primaris bikes)
• 3 Eradicators (new unit)
• 10 Assault Intercessors (first primaris assault marines)
  
  Nothing here was a straight-up rehash of an existing model or unit. They all either brought things into the new Primaris Era or added interesting new options, or both. It was a great box.
  
  
• 10th edition (Leviathan) was another great box full of new or newly-primaised units:
• 1x Captain in Terminator Armour: new upsized version of a popular character type
• 1x Librarian in Terminator Armour: ditto
• 1x Lieutenant with Combi-Weapon: yet another primaris lieutenant but with a new ability
• 1x Apothecary Biologis: Not a normal apothecary and with some useful abilities
• 1x Ballistus Dreadnought: New type of dreadnought
• 5x Terminators: Upsized to fit the new scale but otherwise the traditional squad we all know and love
• 5x Sternguard Veterans: upsized version of a popular squad type
• 10x Infernus Marines: a new squad (or two) of flamethrower specialists 
  
  So there was not as much pure new stuff in this one but it was still well received because of the new terminators and dreadnought. This was also the "shooty" batch of marines to balance out the melee-heavy group from 9th. 

Old non-primaris Librarian

• For 11th now though it's a little different. This one is not mainly ranged or melee it has more of a balance of the two but it also has the first duplicates of existing primaris units which is not really anything anyone was crying out for:
• 1x Captain with Relic Shield: It's another sword & board marine captain ... we just had one of those in the 9th edition starter set. I like it but it seems a little soon to do another one.
• 1x Librarian: This is another walking-normal-power-armored libby and while I love the pose - a callback to a prior librarian model - there is an existing primaris librarian that hasn't been out that long. 
• 1x Chaplain with Jump Pack: I've loved the idea of the jump-chaplain since the RT days and one of my first "finished" models was an old metal chaplain with an old metal jump pack. This guy looks good and I'm happy to finally have one officially updated to the newer scale.
• 1x Ancient: We just had an ancient in the 8th edition box - granted that's not new - but there is also one available in a standalone character box and another one available in the "company heroes" box and probably a few others I am forgetting. Did we really need another ground-ponding banner guy in normal power armor? 
• 10x Intercessors: This is where it really feels like filler. Sure every box like this needs some basic shooting marines - though 9th didn't and 10th didn't so much - but these look very much like what we already have and they have no special loadouts or new equipment options. They have a few different pieces here and there like a helmet or a breastplate but we had the first intercessors in the 8th edition box and then we had the multipart kit later in that edition and those intercessors have been packed into many if not most of the combat patrols and battalion boxes and starter sets ever since. No one playing today lacks basic intercessors. I know this unit was expected but it feels dramatically uninspired.
• 5x Vanguard Veterans with Jump Packs: They're fine but the old Vanguard Vets were know for versatility and having options for a bunch of different melee weapons. Now we may lose that in this edition (like we did in 10th on the old kit) but even if we do from a modeling point of view "everyone has a power sword" feels a little dull. I think we are all hoping the inevitable new multi-part kit will have more choices.
• 3x Eradicators with Heavy Bolters: Sure, ok. Eradicators came out with the 8th box with melta weapons and heavy bolters are pretty widely available in a marine army but they might have some utility. Their special rules are kind of ridiculous. The models do look good so I'll give them that.
• 1x Land Speeder: This is the one I like the best. I was always a fan of the Land Speeder going back to my metal RT speeders and I was disappointed to see the basic super-versatile model disappear awhile back. The heavy speeders felt like they were a little much for a fast scout and strike vehicle. This one though is a genius creation coming in a smaller size more like the old versions and packing all of the weapon options onto a single chassis! I think this is a great unit that almost any army can use and I plan to end up with multiples of them.

New Librarian! What a refreshing new design!
(I do love this pose for these guys though)

• The only really new thing here is the speeder with half credit for the eradicators. The chaplain and vanguard vets are a scale update and everything else is a new primaris update of an existing primaris model. There's a reason people were calling this part of the box "boring" and they are not wrong.

The Xenos half of the boxes has usually been interesting at least:

• 8th edition gave us a major Death Guard refresh that gave us updates to old models and a bunch of new types, expanding the army to the point it became its own force with a separate codex for the first time. It was a very cool set. Maybe someday I will finish painting mine ...
• 9th edition gave us a major Necron update with refreshed warriors and scarabs and some characters both new and refreshed, and a new unit type. It was great for them and I did manage to finish painting mine a couple of years ago.
• 10th gave us a major Tyranid refresh with some redesigned models and a bunch of new ones, units and characters alike. It was also a great set and no, I have not even finished building mine. 

Now for 11th the OpForce is Orks and it is a big refresh for them too:

• 1 Warboss: An important unit in an Ork army and as much as I love the previous version it has been a while. This guy looks great and he's a fair bit bigger (on a 50mm base now) plus we know there's a multipart kit coming too so we will have some good options here.
• 1 Bannernob: Orks have had these for quite a while (they were metal before) but they pulled them out of the list in either 9th or 10th. This unit looks good and thankfully means we get our banner unit back in the army list.
• 1 Bigboss: These have been gone for a while too but they were a well-known unit a few editions back. Glad to see him return and fill the "Ork Lieutenant" niche.
• 1 Painboy & 1 Grot Orderly: We do have models for these already but it has been awhile since they came out. Still not sure about the look but at least if you want more than one the old and new should mix together fairly well. 
• 1 Weirdboy: Not a big fan of this mini but at least we do have a new model. 
• 20 Ork Boyz: Well, they had to be in this box and they do look good. Not sure how customizable they will be as I haven't started in on them yet but more boyz is not a bad thing.
• 10 Gretchin: OK, sure. Did they really need to be in the big box though? I know the whole thing is a tribute to the 2nd edition starter set but I feel like these could have been something more interesting and I don't know of any Ork player that lacks for grots.
• 1 Wartrakk: This ... yes! A longtime staple of Kult of Speed lists finally returns after a few editions away, and it looks amazing! I've already ordered a couple more and dug my old ones out of storage.
• 1 Big Mek Dakkarig: The one truly new unit here. I had mixed feelings about it on first sight but it has grown on me. It leans heavily into the dakka side of things with limited melee capability but that may be OK. It looks a lot like a looted and upgunned imperial guard sentinel but I think I'm ok with that too. It's supposed to be driven b a Big Mek but it has no repair or leadership type abilities, just a 5+ inv save to represent a force field of some kind I suppose. It's taken a while for me to warm up to it but now I think I do like it.

Now to build it all. It's going to take a while but hopefully I can get the parts I like built and basecoated and into action soon. 

40K Friday: More Orks

 

Progress was slow this week but I have another Grey Knight Terminator squad almost ready to go in the case. I'm still fighting the stupidly fiddly nature of the "almost done" model where the last 10% of finishing it takes as much time as the entire process before that. It's why getting to that clearcoat & flocking stage feels so good.

Most of the time however went to Orks. I am trying to maintain focus on them right now. There is some finishing happening here too - mainly the Morkanauts - but there is a fair amount of building happening too as I try to finish out stuff they should have had years ago. The goal is to get it to a certain point and then see what the new edition brings, knowing full well I will still be building as the new edition starts too. 

They look good painted up - this one is obviously not mine

The other wild idea that has crept in is the one I mentioned last time about a potential Blood Axe force in half track-ish looking vehicles. It's been in my head for a few years now as the ork battlewagons look like a half track of some kind if you leave off the top. Some head-swaps for the boyz riding inside and suddenly we have a old-school-looking new force using mostly stuff I already had. I might throw in some of those new guard vehicles as trukks and a looted Russ or three as tank support. It would be far more sensible to not do this and instead roll it all into either my Goffs or my Evil Sunz but I'm really feeling this as it's own sub-force that I could use on its own or team up with other parts.  

I mean it -is- a halftrack technically anyway already!
(Imagine this in a kind of camo grey scheme) 

So now the question really is do I compile the parts to do this but save it for later once I have finished more of the stuff I have started? Or do I work some of it in too and just make a mess of it - though it would still be "working on orks" which at least sounds better than switching over to Guard or Dark Eldar or something else. 

More to come.

May RPG Action

 

With Variable Dave running his DCC interlude campaign - next session this weekend - it's a weird feeling to not be the one prepping stuff. I had forgotten how much less there is to do to be ready for a game as a player once you have a character ready to go. I mean, I'm relishing the chance to just play, especially with some of my regular crew, but it is a change in perspective. I think it's good for a GM to get to play every once in a while to get a refresh on how that feels but it has been awhile since I've had the chance. Being a party of 1st level DCC characters I expect there to be some carnage but it will be fun regardless.

That said there's always some level or prepping going on - right now the plan is still to run Necessary Evil as my next campaign so I've been skimming back through the Savage Worlds rules and powers. Then I'll hit the Super Powers Guide and the NE book itself. There is a pile of RPG books on the to-be-read shelf but I'm trying not to get distracted beyond reading back through the DCC rules and the Savage Worlds stuff.

Really trying not to get distracted by this ...

It is nice to have a steady group going - we always have a game running even if we skip a week or two here and there. Consistency is hugely important to keeping a group connected. Everyone knows that the default is "there's a game Saturday night" and exceptions will be discussed in advance. For me now it's nice to know I can hand things off to someone else and play and keep things going too. 

Anyway, more to come next week.

40K Friday: Orks!

 

I am still working on the GKs part of the time - got to move a terminator squad and a dreadnought into the "done" case last week - but as 11th edition draws closer I decided I ought to take a serious look at my Orks and try to get them into shape/fill in some gaps/grab some units that may be disappearing or getting replaced soon.

On the Replacement Candidates front it matters because I like some units to fit together, to look like they go together, and while it matters less with orks than with some other armies it does still matter. I assume anything new will be bigger and a least slightly different style-wise. I like most of what I see in the new box for orks though I am not a huge fan of that new weirdboy. So if I am going to fill in some units alongside some existing units I am inclined to pick up more of the existing kits and use whatever new stuff comes out for something new. Also - parts! I am not sure that some of my alternate ork heads, for example, will fit right or look right on the newer boyz or whatever they end up doing with nobz so I need to make sure I have enough heads and bodies that are compatible with each other before these old kits go out of production. 

This guy is great, no complaints here

Right now I have a good-sized Goffs force that is the bulk of force. It's mostly infantry with walker support and I think I'm going to stick with that theme. So the first round of painting time went into improving the pair of black partly-painted Morkanauts I've had sitting around for a few years. They've been used but I've never been ready to call them "finished" so why not try to get them into that state? Plus it's a nice break to paint something orkish that doesn't come in batches of 20. A bunch of boyz, nobz, meganobz, dreads, kans, 'nauts ... i think this makes a great core ork force.

Not as crazy about this guy ... I like my weirdboys to have crazy hair, not Doc Ock tentacles

For a long time now the other part of my ork army has been an Evil Sunz force. Buggies, bikes, trukks, battlewagons - you know, vehicle heavy! There are some boyz here too, plus a unit of meganobz, and some walkers but the emphasis was on the speedy stuff shooting things up and dumping out smaller units of boyz here and there. I'm probably going to stick with that here but there are a lot of things that need to be finished - concepts are easy, building is pretty easy, but finishing things is clearly a stretch for me. 

There may be a third element lurking around now. For a long time I was thinking I might add a Bad Moons force, mostly big gunz, some lootas, probably some walkers and tanks here too, but it never really coalesced into "yes I want to do this now". Recently though I've been looking at how my official battlewagons are built and some of the custom ork heads I picked up a while back and I've been thinking a lot about a Blood Axe force. This would be 50-60 boys, possibly some burnas, packed into 3 battlewagons and then maybe a few trukks. Not sure what else yet but I'm really stuck on the visuals in my head for this and a lot of it is stuff I already have. If the Goffs are my ground pounders, the Sunz are my Recon in Force element, then maybe Blood Axes would work for mechanized infantry.

This just screams "Ork Trukk for Blood Axes" to me

Do I need this many orks? No. Would I ever let that stop me? Also no. Lord knows it hasn't so far ...

So anyway there's the update on the latest area of focus. Yes, I've jumped around a lot this year but I am actually getting things done with these armies so I feel pretty good about it. More to come!