tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4999500110309022298.post2340785632593412150..comments2024-02-27T07:06:23.481-06:00Comments on Tower of Zenopus: I is for: IronheadBlacksteelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16289298640828309072noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4999500110309022298.post-41528794518608144422011-04-10T15:46:30.096-05:002011-04-10T15:46:30.096-05:00Thanks BA. I agree with you on the ICONS points th...Thanks BA. I agree with you on the ICONS points thing. After statting up these characters I think 50-60 is a more reasonable range. I saw some of your comments on some other blogs when it came out and I agree with many of them. It does make for an easy translation step between different games in some ways and that's one reason I'm using it here. Writing up all of these characters for Champions or even M&M would take more time than I really have. I'm working on some of them in my free moments and I'll probably put those up at the end of the month.Blacksteelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16289298640828309072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4999500110309022298.post-49945735166039871202011-04-09T22:40:07.859-05:002011-04-09T22:40:07.859-05:00I like this character. He's neat and definitel...I like this character. He's neat and definitely rocks the DIY hero concept to the T.<br /><br />I do not get how ICONS comes up with its point base for characters. The average NPC hero and villain in the book are close to or over 60 points. Saying AI comes in a little higher than recommended at 58 points seems OK and no surprise to me because there is almost no way to make a decent character in ICONS for the recommended 45 points.<br /><br />Now obviously that's just IMHO. I was highly disappointed with ICONS and it just rubs me the wrong way for a lot of reasons. Still, a 60 point base would seem to make sense to me when compared to the NPCs and the starting characters in most Supers games (like Champions and M&M).Adam Dicksteinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04840144928096089178noreply@blogger.com